Home
VACLAV KLAUS: "LET'S NOT GIVE UP FIGHTING CLIMATE ALARMISM, IT IS NEVER LATE!"
Policy

Posted 24 December 2017

"As someone who personally experienced central planning and attempts to organise the whole of society by directives from above,  I feel obliged to warn against the arguments and ambitions of the believers in the global warming doctrine. Their arguments and ambitions are very similar to those we used to hear when living under Communism.  These dangerous ideas should be resisted. It must be done at a political level. We have to explain it to the common people."  The first Prime Minister and later two-term President of Czechoslovakia, Dr Vaclav Klaus, telling a Paris audience why it is vital to oppose the global waming alarmism now known as "climate change."

Read it here 

 
MAN-MADE 'GLOBAL WARMING SCAM IS THE REAL FAKE NEWS
Policy

Posted 22 December 2017

"President Donald Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Agreeement on climate change because it is a bad deal for America.  He could easily have made the decision simply because the science is false.  However, most of the American and global public have been brainwashed into believing the science is correct (and supported by the faux 97% consensus), so they would not have believed that explanation."  Tom Harris, executive director of the International Climate Science Coalition, and Dr Timothy Ball, distinguished Canadian climatologist background how the climate 'crisis' was manufactured, and why the alarmist science has no foundation.

Read it here 

 
WAR ON COAL HURTS ENVIRONMENT AND THE POOR
Economics

Posted 22 December 2017

"A modern, highly efficient, supercritical coal-fired station with stack gas cleanup is very clean indeed, essentially emitting only water vapour, carbon dioxide and nitrogen. The stack gas cleanup removes virtually all of the sulfur dioxide and the nitrous oxide, the real pollutants. The only thing it discharges that could properly be called a pollutant is the ash, and this is not difficult to contain if it is done properly.  In the Washington Times, International Climate Science Coalition executive director and New Zealand energy expert Bryan Leyland explain how and why coal remains a safe, reliable and affordable means of generating electricity, especially fior poorer communities.

Read it here  

 
CLIMATE UNCERTAINTY: CONTRAST BETWEEN WHAT SCIENTISTS SAY IN PUBLIC & IN PRIVATE
Science

Posted 30 November 2017

How dependable is climate science? Global warming mitigation policies depend on the credibility and integrity of climate science. In turn, that depends on a deterministic model of the climate system in which it is possible to quantify the role of carbon dioxide (CO2) with a high degree of confidence. This essay by UK analyst Rupert Darwall explores the contrast between scientists' expressions of public confidence and private admissions of uncertainy on critical aspects of the science that undergird the scientific consensus.(Foreword by US scientist, Judith Curry).

Read it here 

 
AUSTRALIAN SCIENTIST: DATA DOES NOT SUPPORT CLAIMS THAT CO2 CAUSES DANGEROUS GLOBAL WARMING
Science

Posted 23 November 2017

Dr Ian Flanigan, an Australian graduate in chemistry, explains why claims that carbon dioxide is a significant cause of global warming cannot be supported if the scientific method is applied. "Let us do the impermissible and look at the science behind the question of whether carbon dioxide is causing dangerous global warming. The scientific method for investgating a new idea is to pose two falsifiable hypotheses: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis tests the new theory that the scientist is bringing to bear on the issue....A hypothesis can never be proved by this method but it remains viable only as long as it remains consistent with the data. You must not cherry-pick your data; the hypothesis must be consistent with all of the available data."

Read it here 

 

 
NEW PSEUDOSCIENCE SEEKS TO FORCE DEVELOPED NATIONS COMPENSATE 'CLIMATE VICTIMS'
Economics

Posted 19 November 2017

American analyst Dr David Wojick  warns of a new term in pseudoscience: attribution research. "In UN-speak it is called simply 'loss and damage.' This is the unfounded idea that people adversely affected by bad weather are 'climate victims' and as such they should be compensated by the developed countries that supposedly caused the weather to be bad. The potential amounts involved are staggering so it is no under that the developed countries have steadfastly resisted the idea in UN climate negotiations...We are talking about untold trillions of dollars. The Bonn negotiations have produced a draft decision on loss and damage which takes new steps forward. The ste-s are small but still dangerous...they open the door for what is called 'attribution research' to enter. Indeed, attribution is all about the juiced up models showing more bad weather. Since no two models agree on where the bad stuff will occur and there are over 100, all run by government agencies, they can always find one that predicts whatever happens. The attribution game cannot lose because it cheats well."

Read it all here 

 
More...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 1006 of 1311





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
This website is dedicated to the memory of Professor August H. (Augie) Auer jr, a co-founder of the Coalition.